Comments on: Test coverage – interesting only when low http://blog.krecan.net/2009/09/28/test-coverage-interesting-only-when-low/ Short remarks from Java world Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:08:11 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Adam Hošek http://blog.krecan.net/2009/09/28/test-coverage-interesting-only-when-low/comment-page-1/#comment-1164 Adam Hošek Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:17:07 +0000 http://blog.krecan.net/?p=435#comment-1164 Writing test after the actual code is just like the necessary evil to satisfy ourselves or our superiors. I don't say it's better to do not write test at all. All in all I agree with Lukáš. I've posted this article to DZone.com by the way :-) (<a href="http://dzone.com/yJtU" rel="nofollow">http://dzone.com/yJtU</a>) Writing test after the actual code is just like the necessary evil to satisfy ourselves or our superiors. I don't say it's better to do not write test at all. All in all I agree with Lukáš.

I've posted this article to DZone.com by the way :-) (http://dzone.com/yJtU)

]]> By: lzap http://blog.krecan.net/2009/09/28/test-coverage-interesting-only-when-low/comment-page-1/#comment-1163 lzap Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:40:02 +0000 http://blog.krecan.net/?p=435#comment-1163 Yes. Nice. And always remember 100% CC does not mean you have covered 100% of all possible program states. Yes. Nice.

And always remember 100% CC does not mean you have covered 100% of all possible program states.

]]>