<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaFX security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.krecan.net/2008/12/16/javafx-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.krecan.net/2008/12/16/javafx-security/</link>
	<description>Short remarks from Java world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 09:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukáš Křečan</title>
		<link>http://blog.krecan.net/2008/12/16/javafx-security/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukáš Křečan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krecan.net/?p=198#comment-940</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what&#039;s going on in Sun, but I assume that for Sun it&#039;s not a bug but a feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't know what's going on in Sun, but I assume that for Sun it's not a bug but a feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregor</title>
		<link>http://blog.krecan.net/2008/12/16/javafx-security/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krecan.net/?p=198#comment-936</guid>
		<description>Is there anything done about this problem at Sun?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anything done about this problem at Sun?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukáš Křečan</title>
		<link>http://blog.krecan.net/2008/12/16/javafx-security/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukáš Křečan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krecan.net/?p=198#comment-812</guid>
		<description>Just small update, I have found this &lt;a href=&quot;http://wikis.sun.com/display/PartnerSunPKIstore/Partner+Object+Signing&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;page&lt;/a&gt; about partner object signing and this &lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6695642&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bug&lt;/a&gt; that explains how “Object Signing CA” works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just small update, I have found this <a href="http://wikis.sun.com/display/PartnerSunPKIstore/Partner+Object+Signing" rel="nofollow">page</a> about partner object signing and this <a href="http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6695642" rel="nofollow">bug</a> that explains how “Object Signing CA” works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Rubeš</title>
		<link>http://blog.krecan.net/2008/12/16/javafx-security/comment-page-1/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Rubeš</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krecan.net/?p=198#comment-767</guid>
		<description>to Lukas: I guess that the platform can somehow remember that the user approved usage of a signed jar for a certain applet. So this binding must be implemented by browser plug-in. I think that it&#039;s quite reasonable to do so. I suppose that it&#039;s done this way. Anyway, we can try it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to Lukas: I guess that the platform can somehow remember that the user approved usage of a signed jar for a certain applet. So this binding must be implemented by browser plug-in. I think that it's quite reasonable to do so. I suppose that it's done this way. Anyway, we can try it...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v6ak</title>
		<link>http://blog.krecan.net/2008/12/16/javafx-security/comment-page-1/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>v6ak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krecan.net/?p=198#comment-762</guid>
		<description>To Lukáš Křečan: I have no experience with Java Reflection API. I have never used it. I know what can I do only. I do not know these restrictions in Java Reflection API.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Lukáš Křečan: I have no experience with Java Reflection API. I have never used it. I know what can I do only. I do not know these restrictions in Java Reflection API.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukáš Křečan</title>
		<link>http://blog.krecan.net/2008/12/16/javafx-security/comment-page-1/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukáš Křečan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krecan.net/?p=198#comment-761</guid>
		<description>To v6ak: First of all, I think (I am not sure)  that you cann&#039;t use the reflection API in the sandbox. 
And I am not sure how it works with trusted CAs. They are listed in Java Control Panel, in the security tab. But even when I delete all of them, &quot;Object Signing CA&quot; is apparently trusted automatically. I will be glad if someone explain it to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To v6ak: First of all, I think (I am not sure)  that you cann't use the reflection API in the sandbox.<br />
And I am not sure how it works with trusted CAs. They are listed in Java Control Panel, in the security tab. But even when I delete all of them, "Object Signing CA" is apparently trusted automatically. I will be glad if someone explain it to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukáš Křečan</title>
		<link>http://blog.krecan.net/2008/12/16/javafx-security/comment-page-1/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukáš Křečan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krecan.net/?p=198#comment-760</guid>
		<description>To Martin: How do you bind application to its library? An application is just bunch of JARs. That could be solved by a modular system. But it is impossible to solve it now (unless you include a jar into other jar).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Martin: How do you bind application to its library? An application is just bunch of JARs. That could be solved by a modular system. But it is impossible to solve it now (unless you include a jar into other jar).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v6ak</title>
		<link>http://blog.krecan.net/2008/12/16/javafx-security/comment-page-1/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator>v6ak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krecan.net/?p=198#comment-759</guid>
		<description>The problem is maybe worse than I thought: IMHO You can use also whole applications. Reflection API enables to access more than I thought.
BTW Is there any default trusted publisher in default settings? E.g. Sun?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is maybe worse than I thought: IMHO You can use also whole applications. Reflection API enables to access more than I thought.<br />
BTW Is there any default trusted publisher in default settings? E.g. Sun?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Rubeš</title>
		<link>http://blog.krecan.net/2008/12/16/javafx-security/comment-page-1/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Rubeš</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krecan.net/?p=198#comment-758</guid>
		<description>The trusted library should be trusted only in the context of the application which the library uses otherwise it&#039;s serious security issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trusted library should be trusted only in the context of the application which the library uses otherwise it's serious security issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukáš Křečan</title>
		<link>http://blog.krecan.net/2008/12/16/javafx-security/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukáš Křečan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krecan.net/?p=198#comment-756</guid>
		<description>To v6ak: That&#039;s an interesting idea and I think it is possible. You can even take a signed applet and use it as a library in your applet. Sounds dangerous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To v6ak: That's an interesting idea and I think it is possible. You can even take a signed applet and use it as a library in your applet. Sounds dangerous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

